A summary describes the meeting, but it rarely becomes the record.
Teams still have to interpret what was decided, what changed, and what should actually happen next.
Opening TALK
We are pulling the next screen in now.
Why TALK
Transcripts and summaries are useful - but they don't create clarity.
TALK turns conversations into decisions, tasks, and memory your team can actually use.
Problem
A transcript can preserve the conversation. A summary can shorten it. But neither one reliably turns the meeting into a record the team can act on.
The deeper problem is not documenting what was said. It is carrying forward what actually mattered.
Teams still have to interpret what was decided, what changed, and what should actually happen next.
Without structure and confirmation, the useful parts of the conversation slip back into inboxes, notes, and memory.
When all you keep is a transcript or recap, the team still has to rebuild the real context later.
Shift
TALK is built around a different outcome. It does not stop at producing a recap. It helps the team keep the decisions, tasks, summaries, and memory that make the meeting useful afterward.
Typical flow
The meeting becomes a recap, but the team still has to decide what was agreed, what needs to happen, and how to recover that context later.
TALK flow
The conversation becomes structured outcomes the team can confirm, share, and ask about later.
Comparison
Feature
Other tools
Transcripts
Other tools
TALK
Summaries
Other tools
TALK
Decisions captured
Other tools
TALK
Tasks assigned
Other tools
TALK
Human confirmation
Other tools
TALK
Recap sharing
Other tools
TALK
Meeting memory
Other tools
TALK
Ask questions later
Other tools
TALK
Most tools tell you what was said.
TALK tells your team what to do next - and remembers it.
Real example
Meeting moment
"Let's move the launch to next Monday and have Sarah send the rollout checklist by Thursday."
Typical tool output
The team discussed launch timing and rollout preparation. A revised target date of next Monday was mentioned, along with checklist follow-up.
Useful as a recap, but the team still has to interpret what was agreed and who owns the next step.
TALK output
Decision
Move launch to next Monday.
Task
Sarah sends rollout checklist by Thursday.
Ask TALK
Move launch to next Monday.
Why this matters
The value is not only in what happened during the conversation. It is in what the team can still use after the call is over.
Decisions survive the call as a clear record instead of a loose interpretation.
Tasks and follow-through stay connected to the conversation that created them.
Human confirmation keeps important outcomes trustworthy before they are shared.
Ask TALK gives teams a practical way to recover context later without replaying the meeting.
Who it's for
For teams that need client conversations to turn into clean direction, recap sharing, and continuity.
For teams that need commitments, objections, and next steps to remain usable after the call.
For teams coordinating recurring decisions, handoffs, and accountability across meetings.
For teams who have moved past documenting meetings and need a system that keeps the outcomes useful.
Pricing
Start with a careful free tier, move to Pro when structured follow-through becomes part of how you work, and scale into Team when shared memory matters across the whole group.
Start
Free
For individuals and small teams getting started with structured meetings.
A careful starting point with enough room to establish the workflow.
Most Popular
£49/mo
For teams that need reliable follow-through, decision tracking, and meeting memory.
The clearest value tier for teams that rely on follow-through, memory, and recap delivery.
Shared Memory
£149/mo
For teams running frequent sessions with shared context and structured handoff.
Built for teams running higher meeting volume with shared context and structured handoff.
Final shift
TALK is built for teams who need the meeting to become something usable afterward: decisions, tasks, recap sharing, and memory that stays searchable.